All 1 tracked stories fall under one category: defense-tech. Arthur Zhang is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 1 of the 1 tracked story. Each carries 2 original sources on average. We currently track 1 Space & Defense story that mention China Aerospace Studies Institute, all published on August 27, 2026.
Recent coverage · China Aerospace Studies Institute
1story
avg impact
0%positive
0%negative
100% neutral
Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record
— see our methodology for how impact and
sentiment are derived.
What the coverage shows about China Aerospace Studies Institute
All 1 tracked stories fall under one category: defense-tech. Arthur Zhang is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 1 of the 1 tracked story. Each carries 2 original sources on average. We currently track 1 Space & Defense story that mention China Aerospace Studies Institute, all published on August 27, 2026.
Stories tracked
1
Sources per story
2
Computed from the 1 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 2 Space & Defense stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.
Coverage cohort
Appears alongside
Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering China Aerospace Studies Institute. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.
For the space and defense community, the CASI study exposes how China's top military research network tapped U.S. universities in aero-engines, aerospace materials, hyperspectral detection, and advanced communications. The Pentagon's Aug. 31 deadline forces 30 institutions to account for 204 interactions that may have advanced PLA capabilities directly relevant to space and aerospace dominance.
China Aerospace Studies Institute is linked from 1 story on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.
See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source
link? Report a data issue.