Space & Defense entity

Baidu

Company BIDU

Aveox is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 3 of the 3 tracked stories. The 34-day window averages about 0.6 stories each week. The busiest single day carried 2. Source depth averages 1.7 original sources per story, versus 3.9 across the same-window beat baseline.

Last mentioned: 3d ago

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · Baidu

3 stories
7.3 avg impact
0% positive
100% negative

Coverage balance Negative coverage leads. Negative coverage exceeds positive coverage by 100 percentage points.

  • 100% negative

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about Baidu

Aveox is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 3 of the 3 tracked stories. The 34-day window averages about 0.6 stories each week. The busiest single day carried 2. Source depth averages 1.7 original sources per story, versus 3.9 across the same-window beat baseline. Coverage clusters in defense-tech, which accounts for 2 of those 3, with the remainder spread across 1 other category. The 7.3 average consequence score is above the beat benchmark of 7.1 in the same window. We currently track 3 Space & Defense stories that mention Baidu, published between June 22, 2026 and July 25, 2026.

Stories tracked
3
Per week
0.6
Sources per story
1.7

Computed from the 3 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 240 Space & Defense stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Baidu. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Stories mentioning Baidu 3

Baidu is linked from 3 stories on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.

See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.