Space & Defense entity

Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC)

Company

All 1 tracked stories fall under one category: defense-tech. Of the tracked stories, 1 of 1 also mention CASC, the most common co-covered peer. Source depth averages 2 original sources per story, versus 3.1 across the same-window beat baseline. Their average consequence score of 6 runs below the beat's 7.6 for that window.

Last mentioned: Mar 21, 2026

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC)

1 story
6 avg impact
0% positive
100% negative

Coverage balance Negative coverage leads. Negative coverage exceeds positive coverage by 100 percentage points.

  • 100% negative

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC)

All 1 tracked stories fall under one category: defense-tech. Of the tracked stories, 1 of 1 also mention CASC, the most common co-covered peer. Source depth averages 2 original sources per story, versus 3.1 across the same-window beat baseline. Their average consequence score of 6 runs below the beat's 7.6 for that window. We currently track 1 Space & Defense story that mention Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), all published on March 21, 2026.

Stories tracked
1
Sources per story
2

Computed from the 1 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 42 Space & Defense stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC). Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Stories mentioning Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) 1

Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) is linked from 1 story on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.

See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.